The disc had to rotate with the casing and to allow this the drive rod was mounted in a bearing on the engine mainframe bracket.
It may not be immediately obvious that this is a Dakeyne type engine. It just requires a little imagination!
That it had a horizontal output shaft was clearly a major improvement on the Dakeyne prototype - not many machines require a vertical drive! It looked fairly conventional and would clearly appeal to anyone looking for a small but powerful engine - even if they did not understand how it worked. It was not quite as simple as the hydraulic engine since valves were required to allow for expansive working.
More patents were to follow over the next eight years directed to introducing expansive working and improving sealing - in the latter case going as far as the machining of radial slots in the disc which intermeshed with similar slots in the conical ends of the casing.
Davies and Taylor (although it was Davies that took the leading role) had nine years in which to exploit their design before a competitor of significance entered the market. That competitor was
George Daniell Bishopp of Edgbaston, formerly Locomotive Engineer on the Birmingham and Gloucester Railway.
Bishopp went to the highly reputed engineering company of Donkin & Co based in Bermodsey, London, to build his first engine in 1840. Although again a horizontal engine, it was closer in design to the original Dakeyne engines. However, because it was horizontal, the way of locating and supporting the disc inside the casing had to be redesigned - the sphere could not sit on a spherical bearing on a vertical pillar. So Bishopp extended the drive rod on both sides of the sphere. The ends of the rod fitted into a yoke extending over the top of the casing. The yoke was supported at its centre on a pivoting bearing mounted on slider fitted in a radiused track on top of the casing. This allowed the yoke (and hence the drive shaft/sphere /disc assembly) to tilt in the vertical and in the horizontal plane.
The drive rod was coupled to a large flywheel mounted on the output shaft.
Considerable lengths were taken to improve the sealing. Radial strips were mounted around the conical ends of the casing and these were spring loaded to hold them tightly against the disc as it rolled over them in turn. There were adjustable packings to seal the sphere and casing interface and a seal around the rim of the disc.
A Patent for the engine was granted in 1845.
There were other patentees subsequently such as partners Barnard William Farey and Bryan Donkin (Jr) who claimed further improvements to the basic design directed to, for example , expansion valve gear and sealing. Bryan Donkin, the son of the founder of the eponymous company, had worked with Bishopp on the latter's original engine. Farey, the nephew of the
eminent engineer and polymath John Farey, was employed by Donkins.
To see a working model go to:-